![]() |
The X-Files title card |
While words like “zeitgeist” and “popular fears” have traditionally been used by critics to describe the part of the public perception that the show managed to capture to warrant its unexpected success, a closer examination of the show’s ingredients yields a startling realization: the key to the success of The X-Files lies in the power of mythic storytelling. C. S. Lewis famously attributed to Christianity the status of “true myth.” Presupposing the truth of the biblical texts, Lewis found that stepping from history into the realm of myth brought the true nature of Christ’s power to transform lives into surprising clarity, and from this assumption argued in favor of the nourishing component of myth reading and myth-making. Indeed, for Lewis, the capacity of the human spirit to experience the transcendent quality of the power of myth was a necessary component of the sanctification process, as mythic storytelling has the distinct quality of drawing one “further up” and “further in.”2
Countless essays have been written exploring the various ways in which Carter’s series matchlessly tapped the pulsing vein of a prominent subculture that was present in America at the end of the 20th century. And to be sure, The X-Files did manage to capture lightning in a bottle as far as successfully excavating the cultural zeitgeist of the day, preying on the fears of the modern world to generate taut chillers on a weekly basis. But the show’s power to captivate its audience goes beyond a few well-executed psychological sleights of hand, playing viewers against themselves; rather, Carter’s genius was in his decision to build the show upon mythological conceits. This allowed The X-Files a measure of flexibility in the types of stories told week-to-week, which, in turn, became the key element in the show’s longevity, as there was “something for everyone” to enjoy. For example, one episode could primarily deal with classic gothic horror tropes reskinned to fit a quirky Americana setting (TXF: “Shapes”; “Red Museum”), while another could spend the hour exploring themes ripped from traditional science fiction stories (TXF: “Conduit”; “Soft Light”). Nevertheless, the show held together despite stylistic and tonal changes because of a key mythological construct: the central relationship that viewers were asked to invest themselves in was built upon two character archetypes: the believer, and the skeptic. But what sets The X-Files apart from other mythological works of the 20th century (The Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, etc.) is that these two archetypes are constructed in a way that is unique to postsecular modernity.3
Modern Archetypes
Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) is an Oxford-educated Special Agent with the FBI, with a background in psychology. Though an undeniably brilliant analyst originally with the Violent Crimes Section, unconventional investigative methods stemming from a dogged belief in the regular occurrence of supernatural phenomena led to his being dubbed “Spooky” Mulder by his peers. Lambasted by both co-workers and superiors for his wonky theories, Mulder’s determination led to his uncovering the so-called X-files, cases deemed by the FBI to be unsolvable, as well as his eventual assignment to the X-files unit, a project outside of the Bureau mainstream concerned with investigating the unexplained phenomena found within the case files. His obsessive tendencies led to Division Chief Scott Blevins (Charles Cioffi) assigning another agent to the X-files unit to assess the validity of Mulder’s work. Special Agent Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson), a medical doctor with a background in hard science, brought an analytical edge to the investigations that contrasted with Mulder’s convictions toward supernatural explanations. Her assignment to the X-files unit is where the series begins (TXF: “Pilot”). Together, Mulder and Scully worked to uncover the ever-elusive “truth” behind a wide-range of mysterious occurrences all over the globe in a nine season run of the original series (1993-2002), two feature films (1998; 2008), and a revival series (2016; 2018). As characters, Mulder and Scully are archetypes representative of two distinct points of view: the believer and the skeptic, respectively. In pairing these two agents, The X-Files is more than another mere procedural involving strange cases, and Mulder and Scully are more than just another male-female dynamic duo; instead, the series is about how two perspectives (what might be termed “worldviews”) cooperate and collide in intense and interesting ways when attempting to make sense of reality.
The Believer
![]() |
Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) |
The mythological connections here are not to be missed. In one sense, Mulder is uniquely positioned to embody the archetype of the seeker, one who quests for truth by uncovering mysteries and deceptions. In another sense altogether, Mulder’s quest bears some resemblance to the traditional Campbellian “hero’s journey,” featuring the heroic figure who sets out on an adventure that brings the hero from the “common day into a region of supernatural wonder” and into a crisis out of which the hero emerges victorious and transformed.5 The object of this journey (Samantha) is akin to the damsels of old, the “princess in the tower” who must be rescued by the chivalrous knight-errant only by defeating a monster, usually envisioned as a dragon (in this case of The X-Files: aliens).
Mulder’s characterization lends itself to this traditional heroic figure archetype to be sure, but with a certain twist—he is chivalrous and heroic, but he is emotionally unavailable, especially to the women in his life.6 This psychological aspect of Mulder’s characterization serves to deepen his development as the series progresses, and is one of the first ways in which The X-Files works to subvert common storytelling tropes without working to demythologize traditionally mythic themes. Mulder is indeed heroic, but not in the “traditional” sense. Duchovny imbues the character with a clear sense of loneliness, but plays the role with a certain boyish charm that suggests Mulder is every bit a heroic character, but one who is not fully formed in his masculinity. He is easily excitable, at times prone to a cynical and immature sense of humor, and often wears his emotions on his sleeve (TXF: “End Game”; “Redux II”). He is aloof, sleeps on his couch, and is prone to violent outbursts in moments of grief (TXF: “Pilot”; “Dreamland”; “Redux II”). In this respect, Mulder is very much a character forged in the fires of the modern era, a kind of modern man who represents, in Scully’s own words, “Men with Spartan lives, simple in their creature comforts, if only to allow for the complexity of their passions” (TXF: “Max”).
The point here is to realize that, in the moral universe established by Chris Carter in The X-Files, characters are defined less by the quests upon which they embark (because tropes are so frequently subverted) than they are the perspectives they represent. In this way, Carter seems not so much interested in the continuity of the quest as he is in exploring how a particular perspective or worldview as embodied by a specific character reacts to startling new revelations about reality, or “truth.” It is almost as if Carter wants to push the limits of belief systems to their breaking point, and ponder how well these perspectives hold up in the asking of “what ifs.” As far as Mulder is concerned, he is not so much a traditional hero as he is a kind of seeker with an eye to the past. He heralds the legends and romanticisms of old in the face of a society all too eager to deem such things trivial and out of date, a society primed by scientific and technological advancement to leave behind the things of old and march ever forward all in the good name of progress. In this respect, Mulder is a seeker caught in the modern world, and therefore embodies a new archetype that incorporates strands of both the traditional hero and the Jungian seeker—a believer.
The Skeptic
![]() |
Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson) |
As a medical doctor cum FBI Special Agent, Scully might also be viewed as a kind of seeker in her own right, albeit one who quests in the name of science and reason. But neither this archetype, nor the aforementioned heroic archetype, presents an entirely accurate description of the true perspective that Dana Scully embodies. Again, in Carter’s universe, perspective defines the mythological underpinnings. Relying on science and the technology to carry out her quest, Scully’s perspective is one that sees the world through a decidedly rational lens, a perspective that suggests “nothing happens in contradiction to nature, only in contradiction to what we know of it,” one that places faith in the ability of science to explain the unexplainable, even if the exact scientific understanding has not yet been reached by the observer of the thing unexplained (TXF: “Herrenvolk”; “Teliko”). The skeptic, as embodied by Dana Scully, is an archetype that could only have been forged in the fires of the modern era, an era marked by scientific and technological advancements made in leaps and bounds.
Yet to characterize this archetype as a product of secular modernity is a misnomer, though this seems to be the predominant view concerning her character. While Scully is certainly skeptical, she is not irreligious. In fact, the most interesting facet of her character has to do with her commitment to Catholicism. At first glance, to have a character whose general disposition is one of skepticism also embody a deep-set conviction toward religion seems at odds with modernity—but only if modernity is understood as secular. Again, the genius of Chris Carter was to anticipate the direction of modernity in the 1990s, an era that might usually be characterized as “postmodern.” In the character of Scully, Carter seems to be anticipating what philosophers of the modern era were also coming to realize (and some would mislabel as “postmodern”): that secularism (not modernity itself) was short-lived, that religion could not be cut out of everyday life, that the convictions by which every human lived were done so with a kind of religious devotion. It was the realization that “in the day-to day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such thing as atheism. There is no such thing as not worshipping. Everybody worships.”7
This compelling struggle between believer and skeptic formed the central conflict of the show. A conflict demonstrated between the two perspectives embodied and given voice by two character archetypes, and in a way the central conflict within the characters of both Scully and Mulder themselves: science against religion, reason against faith.
Religion and Myth in The X-Files
It is precisely because of these religious themes embodied by Mulder and Scully’s search (what, in mythological terms, might be better understood as “quests”) for “the truth,” that The X-Files transcends stereotypical genre conventions to become a work of profound literary quality. And the narrative spun by Carter and a consistent team of writers is nothing short of a mythological tale concerning themes of apocalyptic vision, forbidden knowledge, and, ultimately, redemption.
Chasing Monsters in the Dark: The Myth-Arc of The X-Files
From this point forward, the show beckoned viewers to settle in for the long haul as Mulder and Scully investigated X-files week-to-week. Viewers—like the characters—never knew when a random case involving a strange phenomenon would take a hard right turn and lead them right back to investigating the conspiracy. The shows that followed the case-of-the-week structure became known as “monster-of-the-week” episodes (referring to the frequently bizarre characters and creations that the agents usually encountered), while the episodes concerning the government conspiracy, aliens, and the agents’ personal lives were identified as “mythology” episodes, which, when taken together, constitute the series' overarching narrative, the “myth-arc.” While the monster-of-the-week episodes certainly contain their share of mythological themes, for the purposes of this essay, only the myth-arc will be examined, for it constitutes the overall narrative force of The X-Files, driving the story forward and regularly examining the three important themes already mentioned.
Apocalyptic Vision
![]() |
The Syndicate meets its end in "One Son" |
Forbidden Knowledge
This theme is stunningly recapitulated in the myth-arc of The X-Files, an astounding storytelling choice considering the centrality of science and technology to the Scully character, and therefore the very DNA of the show. But this acts as a powerful warning against the breathtaking scientific achievements and technological advancements of secular modernity, which sought to eradicate such petty things as religious conviction in favor of “enlightenment.”
![]() |
The Cigarette Smoking Man (William B. Davis) in "My Struggle" |
Interestingly, the CSM harkens unto the tempter, Prometheus, and Dr. Frankenstein all in one. The central antagonist of the series, he, like Satan himself, is finally a victim of his own hubris. In the show’s complex mythology, the CSM, on behalf of the Syndicate, is responsible for taking advantage of the initially benevolent aliens who venture to Earth, taking and then reverse-engineering their advanced technology for the government, and finally for his own ends, upon the destruction of the Syndicate (TXF: “Two Fathers”; “One Son”; “My Struggle III”). But his actions are not without consequences, and eventually unleash a deadly pathogen in the form of the sentient, extraterrestrial “black oil” virus (TXF: “Piper Maru”; “Apocrypha”). Mythologically, this likens the CSM to Prometheus, who steals forbidden “fire” (advanced technology) from the “gods” (aliens), to give to man, but whose actions finally lead to the opening of “Pandora’s box” (the alien virus), which threatens the very existence of humanity.
During the course of the series, the CSM also takes on the role Dr. Frankenstein. Late in the show, using forbidden (alien) science, he impregnates Scully—who is unable to bear children—with the intention of creating “the first superhuman child” (TXF: “En Ami”; “My Struggle III”). The child, William, is eventually born, but Scully, knowing her child is a kind of miracle (note here the mythological theme of miraculous conception and birth), elects to give him up for adoption (TXF: “Existence”; “William”). The CSM’s pursuit of this child forms the central plot of the revival series, because the child’s hybrid nature lends him a kind of immortality, the blueprint by which the CSM seeks to start creation anew “just in my [his own] image instead of God’s” (TXF: “My Struggle II”). The mythological theme here is laced with irony, as in the story of Frankenstein: the CSM is William’s “creator,” but his creation flees from him. In a desperate bid to retrieve his creation, the CSM relentlessly pursues the boy until William unexpectedly turns the tables on him, forcing the CSM to kill him, and thereby destroying his own creation. William’s sacrifice buys Mulder enough time to finally shoot the CSM to death (TXF: “My Struggle IV”). The theme here is one that rings true mythologically: the narcissistic creator, too curious for his own good, whose reach far exceeds his grasp, is ultimately undone by his own creation.
Redemption
![]() |
William (Miles Robbins) in "Ghouli" |
But redemption is not won so easily, and Carter acknowledges this. Mulder and Scully, believing William to be dead, must come to terms with the fact that they not only failed to protect him, but also must reckon with the revelation that the child they had for so long believed to be their own was actually a genetic experiment. Scully acknowledges that she has not been the mother she has longed to be, and Mulder realizes that the family reunion he had always wanted was not going to come to pass. Both had, in their longings, created fantasies that each had lived toward, only to have those fantasies shatter against reality in the end. And to leave the characters here, in such a vulnerable state, with the future of the show unclear, would have certainly been unsatisfactory. But, in his wisdom, Carter offers his characters a ray of hope: Scully, it turns out, is pregnant. A second miracle child, this one not a product of genetic experimentation but of actual miraculous conception, is on the way, and Mulder is the father. Carter has given his characters the chance to start anew. It does not undermine the struggles they have gone through, having failed as parents, and as a couple. But it gives them the opportunity to try again—in other words, through William’s sacrifice, the enemy is defeated, and redemption is suddenly within reach. The seekers have found their truth.
Conclusion
1 Paula Vitaris and Dan Coyle, “X’d Out,” Cinefantastique (April 2002), 34.
2 C. S. Lewis, “Myth Became Fact,” God in the Dock (1970; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014), 54-60.
3 See Michael McDuffee, “Postsecular Modernity is not Postmodern,” Fruit of His Lips: Releasing Vital Speech Into the World, Wordpress, May 3, 2011, https://mcduffee.wordpress.com/2011/05/03/postsecular-modernity-is-not-postmodern/. It is my opinion that the “postmodern” can not be, because the modern still is. In short, I do not believe that the “modern” era has been left behind, and that the cultural whims of the day are, as have been termed, “post” modern. While this paper does not afford the time to fully explore this notion, it is crucial to my understanding of The X-Files and related materials to recognize that I believe the culture in which we live to operate on postsecular principles, over against “postmodern.” Modernity has not been left behind; on the contrary, the modern era has only just come into her own, having realized that religion is not so easily expunged from the public sphere, though the same skepticism inherent to traditional categorizations of the modern era still exist. The world is thus postsecular, not postmodern.
4 C. G. Jung, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, 2nd ed., The Collected Works of C. G. Jung vol. 9, pt. 1, trans. R. F. C. Hull, (1969; repr., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981), 43.
5 Joseph Campbell, The Hero with a Thousand Faces, 3rd ed., The Collected Works of Joseph Campbell vol. 17, (1949; repr., Novato, CA: New World Library, 2008), 23.
6 John Kenneth Muir and Chris Carter, “Interview with Chris Carter,” John Kenneth Muir’s Reflections on Cult Movies and Classic Television, Blogger, Dec. 15, 2009, http://reflectionsonfilmandtelevision.blogspot.com/2009/12/interview-with-chris-carter.html.
7 David Foster Wallace. “This is Water” (2005), in This Is Water: Some Thoughts, Delivered on a Significant Occasion, About Living a Compassionate Life (Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 2009), 98-100.
8 John Faulkner and Chris Carter, “Inside the Mind of Chris Carter.” Innovation & Tech Today, Feb. 22, 2016, https://innotechtoday.com/inside-the-mind-of-chris-carter/.
9 Roger Shattuck, Forbidden Knowledge: From Prometheus to Pornography (Boston: Mariner Books, 1997), 14-26.
10 William B. Davis, Where There’s Smoke…: Musings of a Cigarette Smoking Man (Toronto: ECW Press, 2011), 257-258.
2 C. S. Lewis, “Myth Became Fact,” God in the Dock (1970; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014), 54-60.
3 See Michael McDuffee, “Postsecular Modernity is not Postmodern,” Fruit of His Lips: Releasing Vital Speech Into the World, Wordpress, May 3, 2011, https://mcduffee.wordpress.com/2011/05/03/postsecular-modernity-is-not-postmodern/. It is my opinion that the “postmodern” can not be, because the modern still is. In short, I do not believe that the “modern” era has been left behind, and that the cultural whims of the day are, as have been termed, “post” modern. While this paper does not afford the time to fully explore this notion, it is crucial to my understanding of The X-Files and related materials to recognize that I believe the culture in which we live to operate on postsecular principles, over against “postmodern.” Modernity has not been left behind; on the contrary, the modern era has only just come into her own, having realized that religion is not so easily expunged from the public sphere, though the same skepticism inherent to traditional categorizations of the modern era still exist. The world is thus postsecular, not postmodern.
4 C. G. Jung, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, 2nd ed., The Collected Works of C. G. Jung vol. 9, pt. 1, trans. R. F. C. Hull, (1969; repr., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981), 43.
5 Joseph Campbell, The Hero with a Thousand Faces, 3rd ed., The Collected Works of Joseph Campbell vol. 17, (1949; repr., Novato, CA: New World Library, 2008), 23.
6 John Kenneth Muir and Chris Carter, “Interview with Chris Carter,” John Kenneth Muir’s Reflections on Cult Movies and Classic Television, Blogger, Dec. 15, 2009, http://reflectionsonfilmandtelevision.blogspot.com/2009/12/interview-with-chris-carter.html.
7 David Foster Wallace. “This is Water” (2005), in This Is Water: Some Thoughts, Delivered on a Significant Occasion, About Living a Compassionate Life (Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 2009), 98-100.
8 John Faulkner and Chris Carter, “Inside the Mind of Chris Carter.” Innovation & Tech Today, Feb. 22, 2016, https://innotechtoday.com/inside-the-mind-of-chris-carter/.
9 Roger Shattuck, Forbidden Knowledge: From Prometheus to Pornography (Boston: Mariner Books, 1997), 14-26.
10 William B. Davis, Where There’s Smoke…: Musings of a Cigarette Smoking Man (Toronto: ECW Press, 2011), 257-258.
No comments:
Post a Comment